Dedicated to OUR CRAFT. Driven by RESULTS.

By maintaining a singular focus on the outcomes desired by our clients, the professionals at POLING are driven to achieve excellence in all we do.

Our Team Wins 3 Times!!!

Brant Poling has garnered 3 defense verdicts in the last 60 days.  Our team successfully defended a shoulder dystocia case, a birth trauma case, and a retained surgical instrument case.  The opposing counsel in these combined cases asked the juries to award approximately $60 Million in damages.  We are pleased for our clients and want

The Best Lawyers in America 2019 Announced!

Poling is excited to announce two of our attorneys are recognized in The Best Lawyers in America (2019 Edition): Insurance Law, Dayton, OH – Christopher F. Johnson Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Dayton, OH – Christopher F. Johnson Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants, Columbus, OH – Patrick F. Smith

Defense Verdict in Baltimore, MD

Brant Poling received a defense verdict, working in conjunction with local counsel, Kelly Hughes Iverson, in a medical malpractice case pending in Federal District Court in Baltimore Maryland.  The physician was accused of causing an injury to all five brachial plexus nerve roots at the time of birth by applying lateral traction during the delivery. 

Appellate Win!

Attorney Brant Poling successfully argued and defended a recent appeal before the 10th District Court of Appeals.  Appellants argued an Affidavit of Merit filed with the Complaint was sufficient evidence to overcome a Motion for Summary Judgment attested to by Defendant orthopedic surgeon.  The Appellate Court upheld the lower Court’s decision on summary judgment in

Defense Verdict for Attorney Brant Poling

A Summit County jury returned a unanimous defense verdict in favor of the defendant Pain Management physician and his corporation following a week-long trial.  Plaintiff claimed the physician negligently performed cervical and thoracic trigger point injections causing the patient to suffer a delayed pneumothorax (punctured lung) over 24-hours after the procedure.  The defense argued Plaintiff